Trang Benchlife mới đây đã tiết lộ gần như đầy đủ các thông số của card đồ họa giá rẻ Geforce GTX 1050, đối thủ nặng ký nhất của RX460 trong phân khúc dưới 4 triệu đồng. Show
Dĩ nhiên, card đồ họa này sẽ sử dụng GPU kiến trúc Pascal, có mã là GP107. Gần như chắc chắn, GTX 1050 sẽ thay thế cho GTX 950 trước đây, với giá bán tương đương nhưng hiệu năng vượt trội kèm theo nhiều công nghệ mới.  Thông số GTX 1050 được leak bởi BenchLife. Có rất nhiều giả thuyết đặt ra về hiệu năng của GTX 1050, trong tầm giá tương ứng cùng GTX 950, nhưng nhiều khả năng card đồ họa mới này sẽ không thua kém gì GTX 970 của thế hệ trước đó. Điều này hoàn toàn có thể xảy ra, khi mà GTX 1070 mạnh ngang TITAN X (đời cũ), còn GTX 1060 có hiệu năng chẳng kém GTX 980. Cụ thể, GTX 1050 sẽ được trang bị GP107-400, với 768 nhân CUDA. Mặc dù số lượng nhân xử lý thấp hơn nhiều so với mức 1664 CUDA Cores của GTX 970, tuy nhiên so sánh 2 sản phẩm thuộc thế hệ cũ Maxwell và Pascal mới ra mắt, điều đó không còn thực sự mang nhiều ý nghĩa. Hãy nhìn vào GTX 1080, với số lượng nhân CUDA ít hơn so với GTX 980Ti, nhưng lại có hiệu năng mạnh gấp đôi. Điều đáng quan tâm đó là GTX 1050 sẽ có 4GB GDDR5 VRAM, cao hơn mức dung lượng trên GTX 970 (vốn chỉ có 3,5 GB). Không loại trừ khả năng sẽ xuât hiện 1 phiên bản với chỉ 2GB VRAM, cạnh tranh trực tiếp cùng RX480 của AMD, vốn cũng có 2 phiên bản bộ nhớ tương tự.  Ảnh minh họa. Xung nhịp trên GTX 1050 sẽ là 1380MHz, thấp hơn tương đối so với các VGA gần đây của NVIDIA, dù thế điều này cũng không quá quan trọng. Chắc chắn VGA sử dụng GPU GP107 này sẽ hướng đến người dùng phổ thông, mục đích chơi game esport thông thường, đúng như những gì RX460 đang hướng tới. Cũng giống như RX460, GTX 1050 sẽ chỉ yêu cầu điện áp 75W, lấy hoàn toàn từ khe cắm PCI-E 3.0 16x. Nói như vậy, VGA này sẽ trở thành VGA không nguồn phụ đầu tiên thuộc thế hệ Pascal. Hiện vẫn chưa có hình ảnh thực tế nào lộ diện, rất khó có thể xác định được rằng VGA này có được trang bị đầy đủ các cổng kết nối hay không. Giá bán của GTX 1050 được dự đoán sẽ nằm trong khoảng 150 USD, thấp hơn 50 USD so với GTX 1060, nhưng cao hơn tương đối nếu đặt cạnh đối thủ RX460. NVIDIA sẽ chính thức giới thiệu card đồ họa này trong tháng 10 tới đây và bán ra không lâu sau đó. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores1664640CUDA cores1664640Core clock speed1050 MHz1290 MHzBoost clock speed1178 MHz1392 MHzNumber of transistors5,200 million3,300 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)145 Watt75 WattMaximum GPU temperature98 °C97 °CTexture fill rate109 billion/sec58.20Floating-point performance3,920 gflops1,862 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length10.5" (26.7 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.38" (11.1 cm)Width2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)500 Watt300 WattSupplementary power connectors2x 6-pinsNoneSLI options+-SLIno data- MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GBMemory bus width256 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed7.0 GB/s7008 MHzMemory bandwidth224 GB/s112 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIMulti monitor support4 displays+HDMI++HDCP+2.2Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataG-SYNC support++Audio input for HDMIInternalno data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GameStream++GeForce ShadowPlay+no dataGPU Boost2.03.0GameWorks+no dataVR Readyno data+Anselno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.44.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 970 outperforms 1050 by 91% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 970 outperforms 1050 by 91% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 970 outperforms 1050 by 30% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 970 outperforms 1050 by 87% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 970 outperforms 1050 by 76% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% 970 outperforms 1050 by 78% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 970 outperforms 1050 by 58% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% 970 outperforms 1050 by 21% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 970 outperforms 1050 by 105% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 970 outperforms 1050 by 53% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 1050. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 478 Mh/s 279 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) 1.51 Gh/s 0.85 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 22.21 Mh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.48 kh/s 0.3 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 291.61 Sol/s 143.76 Sol/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD82 45 1440p54 24 4K38 22 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207740−45 20−22 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey45−50 +28.9% 38 −28.9% Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50 +114% 21−24 −114% Battlefield 580−85 +44.6% 56 −44.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare65−70 +91.2% 34 −91.2% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +105% 20−22 −105% Far Cry 565−70 +94.1% 30−35 −94.1% Far Cry New Dawn65−70 +58.5% 41 −58.5% Forza Horizon 480−85 +82.2% 45−50 −82.2% Hitman 375−80 +114% 35−40 −114% Horizon Zero Dawn50−55 +96.3% 27−30 −96.3% Red Dead Redemption 240−45 +29% 31 −29% Shadow of the Tomb Raider55−60 +104% 27 −104% Watch Dogs: Legion45−50 +100% 24−27 −100% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey45−50 +88.5% 26 −88.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50 +114% 21−24 −114% Battlefield 580−85 +88.4% 43 −88.4% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare65−70 +171% 24 −171% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +105% 20−22 −105% Far Cry 565−70 +94.1% 30−35 −94.1% Far Cry New Dawn65−70 +71.1% 38 −71.1% Forza Horizon 480−85 +67.3% 49 −67.3% Hitman 375−80 +114% 35−40 −114% Horizon Zero Dawn50−55 +96.3% 27−30 −96.3% Metro Exodus39 +129% 17 −129% Red Dead Redemption 240−45 +344% 9 −344% Shadow of the Tomb Raider55−60 +129% 24 −129% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt81 +113% 38 −113% Watch Dogs: Legion45−50 +100% 24−27 −100% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey45−50 +227% 15 −227% Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50 +114% 21−24 −114% Battlefield 548 +33.3% 36 −33.3% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +105% 20−22 −105% Far Cry 565−70 +94.1% 30−35 −94.1% Far Cry New Dawn65−70 +85.7% 35 −85.7% Forza Horizon 480−85 +141% 34 −141% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt43 +115% 20 −115% Watch Dogs: Legion45−50 +100% 24−27 −100% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare35−40 +100% 18−20 −100% Hitman 340−45 +110% 20−22 −110% Horizon Zero Dawn30−35 +73.7% 18−20 −73.7% Metro Exodus24 +118% 10−12 −118% Red Dead Redemption 218−20 +111% 9−10 −111% Shadow of the Tomb Raider30−35 +113% 16−18 −113% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey27−30 +108% 12−14 −108% Assassin's Creed Valhalla24−27 +178% 9−10 −178% Battlefield 555−60 +107% 27 −107% Cyberpunk 207716−18 +129% 7−8 −129% Far Cry 540−45 +105% 21−24 −105% Far Cry New Dawn45−50 +92% 25 −92% Forza Horizon 450−55 +113% 24−27 −113% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt30−35 +127% 14−16 −127% Watch Dogs: Legion18−20 +171% 7−8 −171% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare18−20 +111% 9−10 −111% Hitman 321−24 +91.7% 12−14 −91.7% Horizon Zero Dawn16−18 +70% 10−11 −70% Metro Exodus13 +117% 6−7 −117% Red Dead Redemption 212−14 +85.7% 7−8 −85.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider18−20 +157% 7−8 −157% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt29 +93.3% 15 −93.3% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey16−18 +100% 8−9 −100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16 +133% 6−7 −133% Battlefield 520 +53.8% 12−14 −53.8% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +200% 2−3 −200% Far Cry 521−24 +110% 10−11 −110% Far Cry New Dawn24−27 +118% 11 −118% Forza Horizon 430−35 +94.1% 16−18 −94.1% Watch Dogs: Legion10−12 +120% 5−6 −120% This is how GTX 970 and GTX 1050 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 24.85 13.03 Recency 19 September 2014 25 October 2016 Cost $329 $109 Memory bus width 256 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1664 640 Memory bandwidth 224 112 Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 75 Watt The GeForce GTX 970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 970 GeForce GTX 1050 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
