What is a typical disadvantage of the ranking methods of performance management pm )?

Forced ranking, a performance management practice pioneered by GE in the 1980s, has been controversial almost from its inception. The popularity of the practice that compares employees against one another in a Darwinian sort of ranking system – also referred to as “stack ranking,” and “force ranking” – has waned in recent years, yet it’s in the headlines again, thanks to a feature in the August issue of Vanity Fair on the affect of stack ranking on Microsoft’s culture. Forced ranking calls for employee groups to be ranked based on their performance – for example, 20% high-performers, 70% medium-performers and 10% low-performers (who are usually sent packing) – a scenario that is a tough pill to swallow for employees as well as managers tasked with keeping their workforce motivated.

Given i4cp’s continued research into performance management processes and strategies – i4cp has published several reports on performance management over the last year and also runs a research working group made up of approximately 20 large employers focused on the topic – we felt moved to share our perspective.

What is a typical disadvantage of the ranking methods of performance management pm )?

Results from a recent i4cp study on performance rankings, published in our Performance Management Playbook: Managing Critical Performance Challenges, show a sharp decline in both forced rating and forced ranking since 2009, with approximately two-thirds of companies that did utilize these practices abandoning them – from 49% in 2009 to 14% in 2011.This drop is understandable given the many shortcomings of force ranking:

Forced ranking can be an engagement and innovation killer.

A force ranking system more or less tells employees that no matter how hard they work, their manager is forced to put them in the bottom 10% group if they do not produce more than their co-workers. Not only can this cause employees to feel unmotivated and disengaged, it creates unnecessary internal competition that can be destructive to synergy, creativity and innovation and pull focus from marketplace completion.

The bottom 10% isn’t always the bottom 10%.

We see significant flaws in the practice of breaking up performance rankings by department. An employee who is in the bottom 10% in a high-performing department might rank much higher when compared to employees in a different department that has lower overall performance. Why should that employee be let go when he or she outperforms those in other fucntions? This isn’t comparing apples to apples; it’s like comparing apples to bacon.

Companies unwittingly give a huge boost to the competition.

From a marketplace standpoint, the bottom 10% of employees at a company such as Microsoft might be the top 10% at one of their competing companies – meaning that when Microsoft jettisons their presumed lower-performing employees, they are providing the competition with fresh talent, and in many cases, their new highest-performing employees.

Forgot the “H” in HCM?

Human beings are much more complicated than data. Force or stack ranking might be a logical concept on paper, but it has unintended consequences when it comes to practical application. The process forgets to look at a variety of circumstances that might lead to lower performance rankings, such as a failure by managers to keep their workforce motivated or poor communication.

Rather than separating employees into arbitrary ranking scores, it is much more beneficial for companies to look at what people are doing day-to-day, how they view the company, how they work within their teams, what they contribute to strategic goals, and what keeps them motivated. Performance management has come a long way since the 1980s, with some things best left in the past – force ranking chief among them.

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Managers often struggle with directing the work of others. Managing people is a skill that serves to motivate employees to do a good job.

Whether you want to call it employee management or performance management, the intended outcome is the same – ensuring that corporate objectives are met.

I recently attended a conference on quality. During my shuttle bus commute from the airport to the hotel, I met another person who was attending the same conference.

When he learned that I was also attending the conference, we began talking about all sorts of things, but performance management (PM) and, more specifically, performance appraisals (PA) came up.

He had very strong feelings about why he thought performance appraisals were a waste of time and ultimately added no value to the employee or organization.

Most anyone who has managed people or has been managed by someone has experienced the sometimes stressful, time-consuming process of performance management.

In theory, I agree that organizations that do not have strong performance management systems can have a negative effect both on employees as well as their managers.

However, a well-designed performance management process can be rewarding for both the employee as well as the manager.

So what are the advantages and the disadvantages of performance management?

1. Time Consuming

It is recommended that managers spend about an hour per employee writing performance appraisals.

I’ve known managers who had to write performance appraisals on 100 plus employees which would take weeks to complete.

And, depending on the number of people being evaluated, the process can take hours to write the department’s performance appraisals – but also hours meeting with staff to review the written material.

A very time-consuming, and tedious task.

2. Discouragement

The performance appraisal process needs to be one of encouragement, positive reinforcement, and a celebration of a year’s worth of accomplishments.

If the performance appraisal process is not a pleasant experience, it has the potential to discourage staff.

It is critical that managers document not only issues that need to be corrected, but also the positive things an employee does throughout the course of a year, and both good and bad should be discussed during a PA.

For instance, encourage employees by sharing observations of successful project completion, positive teamwork, or professional developmental milestones.

3. Inconsistent Message

We all struggle to remember things when we get busy.

It is those times when we remember the bad and forget to acknowledge the great things employees do every day that sends an inconsistent message to employees

Make a habit of documenting employee observations (both positive and negative) when it is fresh.

Keep these notes as a source of information as you share feedback with employees.

This document of observations will provide you with the necessary feedback to review with the employee at performance appraisal time – to both correct behaviors and celebrate success.

Keep notes and accurate records of employee behavior, to send a consistent message to the employee.

4. Biases

It is difficult to keep biases out of the performance appraisal process.

It requires a very structured, objective process, as well as a mature manager to remain unbiased.  Be aware of this and take the time to learn about common rater (bias) errors.

Performance appraisal rater errors are common for managers who assess performance.

Learn to understand these natural biases, so you can ensure your employees receive fair evaluations.

Advantages of Performance Management

1. Performance-Based Conversations

A performance management process forces managers to discuss performance issues with employees.

Managers are busy with day-to-day responsibilities.

This can result in neglecting to have those necessary interactions with staff that provide the opportunity to coach and offer work-related feedback.

What is a typical disadvantage of the ranking methods of performance management pm )?

It is this consistent coaching that encourages staff, affects changed behaviors, and promotes employee development.

2. Targeted Staff Development

All employees are on a development journey.

And, it is the organization’s responsibility to prepare them for increased responsibility.

If done well, an effective performance management system can help to understand employee career ambitions, identify employee developmental opportunities, and be an important part of a succession planning process.

3. Encouragement to Staff

There should be no surprises if issues are addressed in real-time and not held until the annual review.

Performance appraisals are a time to celebrate all the wonderful things an employee does over the course of a year and should encourage staff.

The trick to positive appraisals is to focus on what the employee is doing well while gently course-correcting undesired behaviors.

4. Rewards Staff for a Job Well Done

The reality is people go to work because they need the pay, and employees want to know what behaviors will result in more money.

When pay increases and/or bonuses are tied to the performance appraisal process, staff can see a direct correlation between performance and financial rewards.

This cause and effect is what motivates and encourages employees to perform at higher levels.

5. Under-performers Identified and Eliminated

As hard as we try to screen, train, and manage employees, it is inevitable that some employees just won’t make it.

An effective performance appraisal process can help identify, and document under-performers, allowing for a smooth transition if the relationship needs to be terminated.

6. Documented History of Employee Performance

All organizations must keep performance records on all employees. 

The goal is to maintain a historical record of an employee’s performance and development journey so a new manager can get a sense of progress over time.

This is a document that should be kept in the employee’s personnel file.

7. Allows for Employee Growth

Motivated employees value structure, development, and a plan for growth. 

An effective performance management system can help an employee reach their full potential, which can be a positive experience for both the employee and manager.

A good manager takes pride in watching an employee grow and develop professionally.

Organizations should take a global look at their performance management system and have very objective goals that are tied to strategic initiatives and the performance management process. 

Successful organizations have learned the secret to this. And while not always perfect, striving to constantly improve the process can be one of the best ways to help organizations achieve their Mission.

If you would like to learn more about managing the performance of your employees, you can check out our book on Church Staff Evaluations!

What is a typical disadvantage of the ranking methods of performance management pm )?

What is the disadvantage of ranking method?

Difficult to administer as the number of jobs increases. Rank judgements are subjective. Since there is no standard used for comparison, new jobs would have to be compared with the existing jobs to determine its appropriate rank.

What are the disadvantages of performance management system?

Disadvantages of Performance Management.
Time Consuming. ... .
Discouragement. ... .
Inconsistent Message. ... .
Biases. ... .
Performance Based Conversations. ... .
Targeted Staff Development. ... .
Encouragement to Staff. ... .
Rewards Staff for a Job Well Done..

Which of the following is a disadvantage of ranking methods for performance appraisals?

Which of the following statements is a disadvantage of ranking methods for performance appraisals? The goal of performance management is: They might be competing with a given worker for a promotion, which may affect their motivation to be accurate in their peer evaluations.

What are 3 disadvantages of conducting employee performance evaluations?

Disadvantages of performance appraisals: Performance appraisals are very time consuming and can be overwhelming to managers with many employees. They are based on human assessment and are subject to rater errors and biases. Can be a waste of time if not done appropriately.