The Phoblographer may receive affiliate compensation for products purchased using links in this article. For more information, please visit our Disclaimers page. Not many macro lenses have impressed me in the mirrorless camera category, but the Canon 28mm f3.5 ([amazon_link asins=’B01FFACQYW’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’thephobl-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’e614e7b5-e8ab-11e6-8b0a-0190d499b1f7′]) is probably an underrated lens that you haven’t heard a whole lot about. However, it’s got a few great features to it that make it very useful in various situations. Besides its compact size, it also has a cool macro light built into it. The light can be controlled using a button on the lens and can be very useful in many situations. Pros and ConsPros
Cons
Gear UsedWe tested the Canon 28mm f3.5 lens with the Canon EOS M5. Tech SpecsTech specs taken from the Canon page listing. Focal Length & Maximum Aperture28mm f/3.5 Lens Construction11 elements in 10 groups Diagonal Angle of View51°55′ Focus AdjustmentAF with full-time manual Closest Focusing DistanceNormal Mode: 0.318 ft./0.097m Super Macro Mode: 0.305 ft./0.093m Filter SizeCompatible only when hood attached Φ43mm (attaches to hood) Max. Diameter x Length, Weight2.4 x 1.8 in. (lens retracted), approx. 4.6 oz. 60.9 x 45.5mm (lens retracted), approx. 130g ErgonomicsThe Canon 28mm f3.5 IS STM looks weird; I really can’t lie about that one. It’s just odd. I mean look at it: you’re used to a red ring with Canon, not a white one. And yes when you look at the lens from the front, what you’re seeing is the macro light built into it. When you go to the top of the lens you’ll find the focusing ring along with more texture that I think that Canon should put on their EF lenses. Now here’s where the lens starts to get even more interesting. It needs to be unlocked to shoot but then you can set it to macro focusing or super macro mode. When the Canon 28mm f3.5 IS STM gets extended, this is what it looks like. Again, not going to lie: it’s kind of ugly. The lens has a button on the side that you can press to activate the macro light. Pressing it a number of times changes the type of light that you get. Build QualityThe Canon 28mm f3.5 IS STM and nothing in the company’s EF-M lineup of lenses are weather sealed. It isn’t built terribly at all, just oddly. Ease of UseCanon has made using this lens very simple and straightforward. It needs to be unlocked to be activated which is kind of annoying. Then to go into Super Macro mode you need to turn it again. I understand why Canon would do this because of the small, compact size. But this gets sort of annoying to do. AutofocusThe entire EF-M lineup of lenses aren’t the fastest out there to focus. But this one genuinely isn’t so bad in comparison to everything else on the market. Image QualityThis Canon 28mm f3.5 IS STM is very feature rich and is indeed fun to work with overall. But I don’t believe it to have the absolute best image quality available. With that said though, it’s still not bad; but once you work with the company’s very good 22mm f2, you get spoiled. BokehLet’s start with an amazing thing that this lens can do: and that’s render bokeh. This is due to the extremely close focusing abilities. Chromatic AberrationIn our tests, we weren’t able to find any major issues with chromatic aberration. There isn’t a whole lot of distortion that would make me want to flip a table but it’s there. Color RenditionThe color rendition from this lens tends to be a bit muted–like almost Panasonic muted. If you’re into that and then getting better colors in post, then you’ll like it. But again, the 22mm f2 isn’t like this. SharpnessThe macro light adds a bit more light to your subject so it can make it look sharper. The sharpness here isn’t terrible but it’s also not the greatest on the market. To get even better sharpness, I recommend using a flash–not a constant LED light. Extra Image SamplesConclusionsLikes
Dislikes
The Canon 28mm f3.5 IS STM lens is a beautiful lens in terms of its construction and design. But I feel like the image quality is lacking just a bit. More importantly though, I feel like the EOS M lineup has image quality that lacks; and until this is improved then this lens can’t maximize on its potential. Still though, it isn’t bad; just isn’t fantastic. |