Laptop với bộ xử lý Comet Lake-H thế hệ 10 của Intel giờ có thể đánh giá benchmark một cách dễ dàng hơn mà không cần phải dựa vào số lượng do nhà sản xuất cung cấp, thông tin rò rỉ hay ‘người trong cuộc’. Show
Intel Core i5-10300H được tìm thấy trên MSI GF75 10SCXR. CPU này hiện nằm ở cuối cùng danh sách nhà Comet Lake-H, thay thế cho Core i5-9300H thế hệ 9 và Core i5-8300H thế hệ 8. Thông số kỹ thuật trên giấy tờ cho thấy các dấu hiệu của một sự làm mới kiểu gen-to-gen. Có cùng số nhân, cùng kích thước bộ đêm, 14nm và GPU UHD Graphics 630 tích hợp. Tốc độ xung nhịp Turbo Boost tối đa và cơ bản cao hơn (4,5 GHz so với 4,1 GHz và 2,5 so với 2,4 GHz, tương ứng). Benchmark dưới đây là một ví dụ. Khi so sánh với Core i5-9300H, Core i5-10300H nhanh hơn khoảng 4 – 5% và 7 – 10% trong tác vụ đơn nhân và đa nhân tương ứng. Nếu bạn đang sở hữu một trong hai con chip i5 thế hệ 8 hoặc 9 thì việc nâng lên thế 10 cũng không giúp bạn cải thiện nhiều hiệu năng. Hiệu năng đa nhân cũng chỉ nhanh hơn chút so với AMD Zen+ Ryzen 7 3750H. Có một số laptop trang bị Ryzen 7 3750H, Core i5-8300H hoặc Core i5-9300H có thể vượt trội hơn so với Core i5-10300H. Dưới đây là kết quả Cinebench R15:  Comparing Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price. Place in performance rankingPlace by popularitynot in top-100Market segmentLaptopLaptopSeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Core i5Architecture codenamePicasso (Zen+)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Release date6 January 2019 (4 years old)23 April 2019 (4 years old)Launch price (MSRP)no data$250Current price$1042 $861 (3.4x MSRP) Technical specsRyzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)Threads88Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHzBoost clock speed4 GHz4.1 GHzL1 cache128K (per core)256 KBL2 cache512K (per core)1 MBL3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MBChip lithography12 nm14 nmDie size209.78 mm2149 mm2Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °CNumber of transistors4940 Millionno data64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility++Unlocked multiplierno data- CompatibilityInformation on Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1SocketFP5FCBGA1440Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt Technologies and extensionsTechnological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2AES-NI++AVX++Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+Speed Shiftno data+My WiFino data+Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+TSXno data-Idle Statesno data+Thermal Monitoringno data+Flex Memory Accessno data+SIPPno data- Security technologiesRyzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks. TXTno data-EDBno data+Secure Keyno data+MPXno data+Identity Protectionno data+SGXno dataYes with Intel® MEOS Guardno data+ Virtualization technologiesVirtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H are enumerated here. AMD-V++VT-dno data+VT-xno data+EPTno data+ Memory specsTypes, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported. Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4Maximum memory size64 GB128 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s41.8 GB/sECC memory support+- Graphics specificationsGeneral parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Integrated graphics card CompareAMD Radeon RX Vega 10Intel UHD Graphics 630Max video memoryno data64 GBQuick Sync Videono data+Clear Videono data+Clear Video HDno data+Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHzInTru 3Dno data+ Graphics interfacesAvailable interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs. Number of displays supportedno data3eDPno data+DisplayPortno data+HDMIno data+DVIno data+ Graphics image qualityMaximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces. 4K resolution supportno data+Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@30HzMax resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60HzMax resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60HzMax resolution over VGAno dataN/A Graphics API supportAPIs supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. DirectXno data12OpenGLno data4.5 PeripheralsSpecifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H. PCIe version3.03.0PCI Express lanes1216 Synthetic benchmark performanceVarious benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-9300H by 7% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkPassmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Benchmark coverage: 67% Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-9300H by 7% in Passmark. GeekBench 5 Single-CoreGeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core. Benchmark coverage: 40% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 28% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core. GeekBench 5 Multi-CoreGeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores. Benchmark coverage: 40% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 17% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core. Cinebench 10 32-bit single-coreCinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle. Benchmark coverage: 20% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core. Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version. Benchmark coverage: 19% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core. 3DMark06 CPU3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 9% in 3DMark06 CPU. Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 15% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 8% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core. Cinebench 15 64-bit single-coreCinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 14% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 19% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core. TrueCrypt AESTrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Core i5-9300H by 6% in TrueCrypt AES. WinRAR 4.0WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 98% in WinRAR 4.0. x264 encoding pass 1x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 39% in x264 encoding pass 1. x264 encoding pass 2x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 2% in x264 encoding pass 2. Geekbench 3 32-bit single-coreBenchmark coverage: 5% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 2% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core. Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-coreBenchmark coverage: 5% Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H by 5% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core. Gaming performanceAdvantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 5.34 5.00 Integrated graphics card 4.23 3.07 Recency 6 January 2019 23 April 2019 Boost clock speed 4000 4100 Base clock speed 2300 2400 Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H. The differences in performance seem too small. Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3750H and Core i5-9300H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU. Ryzen 7 3750H Core i5-9300H Similar processor comparisonsWe picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. Rate AMD Ryzen 7 3750H on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate Intel Core i5-9300H on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3750H or Core i5-9300H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
