 Show
Under a Creative Commons license Open access AbstractThe magnitude and complexity of portfolio management operations require that Romanian Financial Investment Companies are to implement and monitor an adequate internal control system over financial reporting. The assessment performed by a public accounting firm in connection with internal control over financial reporting process, provides a major impact upon the reliability of financial statements prepared by these entities and therefore can significantly influence investment decisions. The paper is focused on the relation between the effectiveness of internal controls and risk fraud, involving either misappropriation of financial assets or fraudulent reporting. We based our research on the assumption that an increase of internal controls’ effectiveness results in diminishing risk fraud involving financial assets. We attend to identify significant weak points in the chain of internal controls related to financial assets, capable to increase risk fraud and implicitly to alter the reliability on financial reporting process. Projecting reasonable countermeasures designed to respond the assessed fraud risk factors is also a main preoccupation under author artwork. Keywordsinternal control effectiveness financial reporting process Financial Investment Companies SOX compliance fraud risk oriented audit approach Cited by (0)Copyright © 2012 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. What Are Internal Controls?Internal controls are accounting and auditing processes used in a company's finance department that ensures the integrity of financial reporting and regulatory compliance. Besides complying with laws and regulations and preventing fraud, internal controls can help improve operational efficiency by ensuring budgets are adhered to, policies are followed, capital shortages are identified, and accurate reports are generated for leadership. Key Takeaways
Internal ControlsUnderstanding Internal ControlsInternal controls have become a key business function for every U.S. company since the accounting scandals in the early 2000s. In their wake, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted to protect investors from fraudulent accounting activities and improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. This has had a profound effect on corporate governance, by making managers responsible for financial reporting and creating an audit trail. Managers found guilty of not properly establishing and managing internal controls face serious criminal penalties. The auditor’s opinion that accompanies financial statements is based on an audit of the procedures and records used to produce them. As part of an audit, external auditors will test a company’s accounting processes and internal controls and provide an opinion as to their effectiveness. Internal audits evaluate a company’s internal controls, including its corporate governance and accounting processes. They ensure compliance with laws and regulations and accurate and timely financial reporting and data collection, as well as helping to maintain operational efficiency by identifying problems and correcting lapses before they are discovered in an external audit. Internal audits play a critical role in a company’s operations and corporate governance, now that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has made managers legally responsible for the accuracy of its financial statements. No two systems of internal controls are identical, but many core philosophies regarding financial integrity and accounting practices have become standard management practices. While internal controls can be expensive, properly implemented internal controls can help streamline operations and increase operational efficiency, in addition to preventing fraud. Regardless of the policies and procedures established by an organization, only reasonable assurance may be provided that internal controls are effective and financial information is correct. The effectiveness of internal controls is limited by human judgment. A business will often give high-level personnel the ability to override internal controls for operational efficiency reasons, and internal controls can be circumvented through collusion. The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to protect investors from the possibility of fraudulent accounting activities by corporations, which mandated strict reforms to improve financial disclosures from corporations and prevent accounting fraud. Preventative vs. Detective ControlsInternal controls are typically comprised of control activities such as authorization, documentation, reconciliation, security, and the separation of duties. And they are broadly divided into preventative and detective activities. Preventive control activities aim to deter errors or fraud from happening in the first place and include thorough documentation and authorization practices. Separation of duties, a key part of this process, ensures that no single individual is in a position to authorize, record, and be in the custody of a financial transaction and the resulting asset. Authorization of invoices and verification of expenses are internal controls. In addition, preventative internal controls include limiting physical access to equipment, inventory, cash, and other assets. Detective controls are backup procedures that are designed to catch items or events that have been missed by the first line of defense. Here, the most important activity is reconciliation, used to compare data sets, and corrective action is taken upon material differences. Other detective controls include external audits from accounting firms and internal audits of assets such as inventory. Auditing techniques and control methods from England migrated to the United States during the Industrial Revolution. In the 20th century, auditors' reporting practices and testing methods were standardized. Why Are Internal Controls Important?Internal controls are the mechanisms, rules, and procedures implemented by a company to ensure the integrity of financial and accounting information, promote accountability, and prevent fraud. Besides complying with laws and regulations and preventing employees from stealing assets or committing fraud, internal controls can
help improve operational efficiency by improving the accuracy and timeliness of financial reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, enacted in the wake of the accounting scandals in the early 2000s, seeks to protect investors from fraudulent accounting activities and improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. What Are the 2 Types of Internal Controls?Internal controls are broadly divided into preventative and detective activities. Preventive control activities aim to deter errors or fraud from happening in the first place and include thorough documentation and authorization practices. Detective controls are backup procedures that are designed to catch items or events that have been missed by the first line of defense. What Are Some Preventive Internal Controls?Separation of duties, a key part of the preventive internal control process, ensures that no single individual is in a position to authorize, record, and be in the custody of a financial transaction and the resulting asset. Authorization of invoices, verification of expenses, limiting physical access to equipment, inventory, cash, and other assets are examples of preventative internal controls. What Are Detective Internal Controls?Detective internal controls attempt to find problems within a company's processes once they have occurred. They may be employed in accordance with many different goals, such as quality control, fraud prevention, and legal compliance. Here, the most important activity is reconciliation, used to compare data sets, and corrective action is taken if there are material differences. Other detective controls include external audits from accounting firms and internal audits of assets such as inventory. How do you evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls?How Do You Evaluate Internal Controls Deficiencies?. Assess the Control Environment. ... . Evaluate Risk Assessment. ... . Investigate Control Activities. ... . Examine Information and Communication Systems. ... . Analyze Monitoring Activities. ... . Index Existing Controls. ... . Understand which Controls Are Relevant to the Audit.. Who is responsible for the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting?The auditor's objective in an audit of internal control over financial reporting is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting.
What is internal control reporting?Internal control over financial reporting (ICFR or ICOFR) is a process consisting of policies and control procedures to assess financial statement risk and provide reasonable assurance that a company prepares reliable financial statements.
What is the role of internal control in financial reporting?Ensure the reliability and integrity of financial information - Internal controls ensure that management has accurate, timely and complete information, including accounting records, in order to plan, monitor and report business operations.
|
