Phiên bản 1050Ti ở đây mà mình dùng để đánh giá là mẫu Galax GTX 1050 Ti 1 Click OC. Không phải là Gigabyte, Asus hay MSI đã quá quen thuộc với cộng đồng game thủ hay các bạn trẻ đam mê công nghệ. Galax – một thương hiệu khá nổi tiếng có trụ sở tại Hồng Kông, mới là những người cho chúng tôi cái hình chân thực nhất về GTX 1050Ti. Đầu tiên thì mẫu card đồ họa này được sản xuất trên tiến trình 14nm với mức TDP đạt 75W. Tiếp đến, nó có 768 nhân CUDA (khá khiêm tốn tại thời điểm năm 2022) đi kèm với 4GB VRAM chuẩn GDDR5. Show
Dưới đây là một số bài test bằng phần mềm 3D Mark Đầu tiên là bài test 3DMark TimeSpy  Tiếp đến là bài test 3DMark FireStrike Như anh em có thể thấy, mẫu card đồ họa này chỉ thực sự phát huy hiệu quả ở độ phần giải FHD, nếu đẩy lên mức 2K thì FPS sẽ giảm xuống dưới 30, hoàn toàn không thể sử dụng để trải nghiệm một cách thường xuyên được. Tiếp đến là một số tựa game phổ biến hiện nay. CS:GO - Max Setting League of Legends - Max Setting Team Fight Tatics - Max Setting Assassin's Creed Odyssey - Medium Setting Shadow of the Tomb Rider - Low Setting Thông qua các tựa game ở trên, mình có một vài kết luận dành cho anh em thay cho lời kết. Đầu tiên, đối với các tựa game Esport phổ biến hiện nay, GTX 1050Ti vẫn hoàn toàn có thể đáp ứng đủ cho nhu cầu chiến max setting cho anh em, tất nhiên là ở mức FPS cao ( >100). Còn đối với các tựa game AAA nặng, nhược điểm của tuổi già đã thực sự được làm rõ. Do số lượng nhân CUDA ít, tương tự với VRAM, anh em sẽ chỉ chơi được ở mức thiết lập đồ họa thấp và FPS ở mức trung bình (45-60). General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores768640Core clock speed1151 – 1290 MHz999 - 1189 MHzBoost clock speed1290 – 1417 MHz1139 - 1328 MHzNumber of transistors3,300 million3,300 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)40 - 46 Watt34 - 40 WattTexture fill rate68.0253.12Floating-point performance2,177 gflops1,700 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizemedium sizedlargeInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed7000 MHz7000 MHzMemory bandwidth112.1 GB/s112.1 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsG-SYNC support+no data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131CUDA6.16.1 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.85 +32.9% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 33% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5370 +32.9% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 33% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 29504 +13.1% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 13% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 8752 +22.3% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 22% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 7324 +29.6% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 30% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 46952 +32.7% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 33% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 324705 +1.8% 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 1050 Max-Q by 2% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD58 47 1440p29 22 4K19 14 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207721−24 16−18 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey43 +16.2% 37 −16.2% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +53.3% 14−16 −53.3% Battlefield 557 +23.9% 46 −23.9% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare35−40 +0% 36 +0% Cyberpunk 207721−24 +31.3% 16−18 −31.3% Far Cry 548 +29.7% 37 −29.7% Far Cry New Dawn49 +25.6% 39 −25.6% Forza Horizon 467 +86.1% 35−40 −86.1% Hitman 335−40 +40.7% 27−30 −40.7% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 +38.1% 21−24 −38.1% Red Dead Redemption 221−24 −8.7% 25 +8.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider39 +30% 30 −30% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +44.4% 18−20 −44.4% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey34 +9.7% 31 −9.7% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +53.3% 14−16 −53.3% Battlefield 548 +20% 40 −20% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare35−40 +33.3% 27 −33.3% Cyberpunk 207721−24 +31.3% 16−18 −31.3% Far Cry 544 +29.4% 34 −29.4% Far Cry New Dawn45 +21.6% 37 −21.6% Forza Horizon 461 +69.4% 35−40 −69.4% Hitman 335−40 +40.7% 27−30 −40.7% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 +38.1% 21−24 −38.1% Metro Exodus31 +63.2% 19 −63.2% Red Dead Redemption 221−24 +76.9% 13 −76.9% Shadow of the Tomb Raider32 +33.3% 24 −33.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt46 +31.4% 35 −31.4% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +44.4% 18−20 −44.4% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey18 +12.5% 16 −12.5% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +53.3% 14−16 −53.3% Battlefield 545 +21.6% 37 −21.6% Cyberpunk 207721−24 +31.3% 16−18 −31.3% Far Cry 538 +22.6% 31 −22.6% Far Cry New Dawn42 +23.5% 34 −23.5% Forza Horizon 447 +30.6% 35−40 −30.6% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt25 +19% 21 −19% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +44.4% 18−20 −44.4% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare20−22 +17.6% 17 −17.6% Hitman 321−24 +37.5% 16−18 −37.5% Horizon Zero Dawn18−20 +18.8% 16−18 −18.8% Metro Exodus12−14 +9.1% 11 −9.1% Red Dead Redemption 210−11 +42.9% 7−8 −42.9% Shadow of the Tomb Raider18−20 +12.5% 16 −12.5% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey14−16 +40% 10 −40% Assassin's Creed Valhalla10−11 +100% 5−6 −100% Battlefield 527−30 +55.6% 18−20 −55.6% Cyberpunk 20777−8 +40% 5−6 −40% Far Cry 521−24 +0% 22 +0% Far Cry New Dawn29 +20.8% 24 −20.8% Forza Horizon 424−27 +44.4% 18−20 −44.4% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt16−18 +45.5% 10−12 −45.5% Watch Dogs: Legion8−9 +60% 5−6 −60% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare9−10 +0% 9 +0% Hitman 312−14 +30% 10−11 −30% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Metro Exodus5 −40% 7 +40% Red Dead Redemption 28−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% Shadow of the Tomb Raider11 +37.5% 8 −37.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt16 +23.1% 13 −23.1% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey7 +16.7% 6 −16.7% Assassin's Creed Valhalla6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Battlefield 517 +88.9% 9−10 −88.9% Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 513 +18.2% 11 −18.2% Far Cry New Dawn15 +25% 12 −25% Forza Horizon 420 +53.8% 12−14 −53.8% Watch Dogs: Legion5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and GTX 1050 Max-Q compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 13.85 10.42 Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 34 Watt The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. User ratingsDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
